You know you’re using an EHR when…

I just had my first “yup, we’re now using an EHR” moment.  I was working on populating Epic Problem Lists for the patients on the medical service I’m currently covering.  A not un-common “problem” we see here is the ever-familiar “waiting for placement.”  As we’ve all known for years, this is not considered a real diagnosis, and there is no ICD9 code.  We’ve always skirted the issue somewhat uncomfortably by continuing to write it into our text-based notes, knowing that it is “not real medicine” and yet at the same time knowing that it best reflects the reality of the situation.

And so, populating an Epic Problem List in the wee hours of the morning, I tried this:

There is no fooling a computerized database of ICD9 codes.  Welcome to the EHR.  I’m curious to see how we all work out a solution to “waiting for placement” that both reflects the clinical reality and the economic/billing realities.

(Side-note: I am Aaron Neinstein, a fellow at UCSF in Endocrinology, and a guest blogger invited by Dr Cucina to participate in his live-blog of Epic go-live.)

One thought on “You know you’re using an EHR when…

  1. Does the Epic problem list differentiate diagnoses (icd10 codes) from problems (SNOMED) and require the user to actively convert diagnoses to problems in order to meet the meaningful use stage II summary of care metric requirements?

Join the Discussion ...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s